We started our session with a discussion of our strengths. We felt that there was a strong educational system in place to train scientists and professionals. The small size of our state was viewed as an advantage, allowing excellent communication and the ability to make rapid changes. The county-level execution of vector control programs was also viewed as a strength because programs are tailored to meet local needs. Dedicated people back these county programs. In general, the group thought that the vector control community has a positive public perception. Specifically we felt that the NJ vector control community has a strong national reputation based on our long history and the sharing of our knowledge with others.
We followed with a discussion of our weaknesses. Some felt that many of the pesticide regulations are too restrictive. Overall, our focus is too narrow on mosquitoes, humans, and human diseases. Although our vector control programs are proactive, our response to disease outbreaks is entirely reactive. The long history of many of our programs leads to resistance to change. There is a lack of communication between local agencies such as mosquito control programs and local health officials. A recurring theme in this discussion was a lack of public exposure. Our visibility is poor, cultural/language barriers exist, and we do not work enough on public relations by promoting what we do and why we do it. Without visibility the public is unlikely to assist in reducing vector problems and although many mosquito control programs have the ability to enforce compliance, they do not. This lack of visibility also results in little political strength for our community. Finally, we may not be aware of all of the funding opportunities available, especially federal.
Fortunately, these weaknesses
provide many opportunities. We felt that
we should expand our community to include other unconventional partners such as
the pest control and landscape industries, parks departments, wildlife and
veterinary groups, etc. These groups
could assist in source-reduction efforts, especially on an individual scale and
provide alternative sources of funding and support. The vector control community can broaden its
focus by including other vectors such as ticks, including zoonotic diseases,
and by screening for emerging diseases.
We can invest in the future of our community by increasing our
utilization of the internship program and expanding the entomology minor at
There are many threats and challenges to the progress of our efforts. Funding is an issue as budgets are decreasing. Public reaction to our efforts is not always positive. Climate change may increase vector problems. Increased globalization could result in an onslaught of imported vectors and diseases. Privatization of government programs may result in the loss of control over vector control programs. The number of available pesticides for vector control is limited. There is a shortage of trained professionals especially in the field of medical entomology. Communication and the dissemination of knowledge to the public is difficult. Despite these impediments, the group thought that the vector control community and the Center for Vector Biology was prepared to rise to the occasion.